Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 260: 198-202, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839645

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether sperm banking is under-used in adolescents with cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed our 33 years long experience of semen cryopreservation and identified male subjects with cancer aged 14-21 years who banked their sperm. We hypothesized as a referring model a constant rate of referral in every age category (uniform distribution). In addition, we evaluated whether the distribution of the referrals per age varied according to historical periods and compared semen quality in the different age groups. RESULTS: Overall, 317 subjects were selected. A sharp increase with age emerged (p < 0.001): the number of cases augmented from 4 at age 14 years to 79 at age 21 years. This significant increase persisted even when focussing only on subjects older than 16-18 years. An improvement of the distribution of cases per age group emerged when limiting the analysis to the last decade of activity; however, the increase remained significant (p < 0.001). Finally, we investigated whether semen quality differed according to age groups and failed to show marked differences, suggesting that sperm banking even at the youngest ages could be of potential benefit. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that sperm banking is under-used in adolescents with cancers. Future studies should better clarify the determinants of this low referral and identify interventions that can improve the situation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Preservação do Sêmen , Adolescente , Adulto , Criopreservação , Humanos , Masculino , Análise do Sêmen , Bancos de Esperma , Espermatozoides , Adulto Jovem
2.
Biopreserv Biobank ; 19(1): 27-32, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026886

RESUMO

Introduction: In Italy, the transport of cryopreserved biological material is controlled by several Decrees (Legislative Decree No. 191/2007 and No. 16/2010 and Health Ministry's Decree of October 10, 2012). Given the nature of their applications, the transport of reproductive cells has peculiar quality and safety requirements that must be applied universally, minimizing the chance of error. To standardize the cross-border shipping procedure to meet the quality, traceability, and safety criteria for cells and tissues, it is appropriate to establish a unified process using the same tools, forms, and communication channels. Methods: A working group has been created by SIERR. This "FOCUS Group" was constituted by representatives from Italian-assisted reproductive technology centers and sperm banks who worked together to define joint procedural steps and create specific forms to support the movement of cryopreserved samples. Results: The FOCUS Group identified the critical steps in the communication procedures between Italian centers and created the related forms: patient authorization, request from the recipient center, critical checks carried out by both sending and recipient centers, start of samples transfer, collection, transport and taking responsibility of the biological material, acknowledgment of samples arrival, and acknowledgement of any adverse event that occurred. Discussion: Indications on shipping between tissue institutions and legal responsibilities are important points and a working protocol with shared transport forms has been defined. Standard Operating Procedures are necessary in light of the increasingly widespread movement of biological samples between the various countries, and represent a valid means of support for the patients who could have a higher awareness of safety and traceability during each stage of gamete transport.


Assuntos
Criopreservação , Células Germinativas , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Reprodução , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida
3.
Hum Reprod ; 29(12): 2620-7, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25316452

RESUMO

STUDY QUESTION: Is the presence of ESX1 mRNA in seminal fluid (SF) an indicator of residual spermatogenesis in men with non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA)? SUMMARY ANSWER: ESX1 mRNA in SF is a suitable molecular marker for predicting the presence of residual spermatogenesis in testis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ESX1 is an X-linked homeobox gene whose expression in testis is restricted to germ cells. We previously reported, in the testicular biopsies from azoospermic men, a positive correlation between the presence of ESX1 mRNA and residual spermatogenesis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We investigated ESX1 mRNA expression in 70 testicular fragments (TF) and 56 (SF) of 70 NOA men. As controls, we analyzed 8 TF from men with obstructive azoospermic (OA) and 9 SF from normozoospermic men. For all patients we considered the histological classification of testis biopsies and the recovery of spermatozoa by surgical procedures. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Relative ESX1 mRNA expression was evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR using the ΔΔCt method. The results were compared with the recovery of spermatozoa at surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In TF from NOA patients we found that: (i) ESX1 mRNA level was significantly decreased as the severity of spermatogenic defects increased (P < 0.0001, one-way analysis of variance); (ii) the presence of ESX1 mRNA can predict the success of sperm retrieval (sensitivity: 80%). In SF from NOA patients we found that: (i) ESX1 mRNA was present in 78.5% of NOA men; (ii) the presence of ESX1 mRNA could predict the success of sperm retrieval (sensitivity: 84%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Spermatozoa were recovered at surgery in 5 out of 12 patients whose SF was negative for ESX1 mRNA expression. We think that discrepancies between molecular and clinical results could be reduced by analyzing more than one ejaculate from each man. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The data confirm that the ESX1 transcript in the semen of men with NOA is a suitable molecular marker for predicting the presence of residual foci of spermatogenesis in the testis. The implication of these results is that some patients 'with azoospermia', although having a severe impairment of spermatogenesis, could still maintain residual foci of spermatogenesis in limited areas of the testes, not always recovered by surgery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by the Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico: Ricerca Corrente [grant number RC2014/519-02] to M.M. and from ASM onlus 2010-2011 to M.M. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Assuntos
Azoospermia/genética , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/metabolismo , Sêmen/metabolismo , Espermatogênese/genética , Azoospermia/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Proteínas de Homeodomínio/genética , Humanos , Masculino , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Análise do Sêmen , Recuperação Espermática
4.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 18(3): 315-9, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19298728

RESUMO

In a population of non-obstructive azoospermia patients, the efficacy of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) and conventional TESE was evaluated in a randomized controlled study on 138 testicles, classified and paired in a 48-square table according to the different classes of the following three variables: patient plasma FSH concentration, orchidometry and testicular histology. Sperm retrieval was positive in 21/22 testicles with hypospermatogenesis (11/11, 10/11; microTESE, TESE respectively), in 12/14 with maturation arrest (6/7, 6/7), in 16/22 with incomplete Sertoli cell-only syndrome (8/11, 8/11), and in 16/80 with complete Sertoli cell-only syndrome (11/40, 5/40). Sperm recovery was positive in 5/24 patients with FSH concentration > or = 3 x maximum value of normal range (N) (4/12, 1/12), in 17/40 patients with 2N < or = FSH < 3N (9/20, 8/20), in 30/48 patients with N < FSH < 2N (17/24, 13/24), and in 13/26 patients with FSH = N (6/13, 7/13). Regarding orchidometry, sperm recovery was positive in 11/18 testicles with volume (V) > or = 12 ml (6/9, 5/9), in 27/56 testicles with 8 ml < or = V < 12 ml (15/28, 12/28), and in 27/64 testicles with V < 8 ml (15/32, 12/32). FSH value and the surgical procedure were the two variables significantly (P < 0.05) predicting positive sperm retrieval.


Assuntos
Azoospermia/terapia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodos , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/sangue , Humanos , Masculino , Espermatozoides/citologia , Testículo/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...